The
government press release for today's copyright reform contains the following "talking point":
The proposed amendments include:
* new exceptions that will allow Canadian consumers to legally record television shows for later viewing and copy legally acquired music onto other devices, such as iPods or cellphones;
However, according to the
Globe and Mail's article:
Also, as long as consumers don't attempt to circumvent the digital rights management (DRM) technology, they can transfer media files them from their PC to their portable device without worrying. The new bill would make it illegal to provide market or import tools “designed to enable circumvention.”
Looks like the G&M has it right. Reading
the text of Bill C-61, Section 27, subsection (2) of the
Copyright Act will be changed to indicate that it is an infringement:
(f) to circumvent or contravene any measure taken in conformity with paragraph 30.01(5)(b), (c) or (d).
So if you legally buy a CD,
you're only allowed to copy it to your PC or digital device if the record companies let you. What do you want to bet that
every major CD will come with copy protection now? Many of them already do.
I'm waiting to read the bill before commenting on other aspects, but it sounds like the part to which I most objected has been included.
Michael Geist has done a quick analysis, and it looks like they're trying hard to spin this as positively as they can without making any changes to the consumer-screwing aspects of the bill.
As Geist says:
The digital lock provisions are worse than the DMCA. Yes - worse. (...) The effect of these provisions will be to make Canadians infringers for a host of activities that are common today including watching out-of-region-coded DVDs, copying and pasting materials from a DRM'd book, or even unlocking a cellphone. The liability for picking the digital lock is up to $20,000 per infringement.